Tether, the world’s largest stablecoin issuer, has confirmed plans to launch USAT — a fully U.S.-compliant stablecoin — by the end of 2025, in what could be its most radical pivot yet. If successful, USAT could rewrite the stablecoin hierarchy, but its launch also comes with steep execution and regulatory risks.
A break from the offshore playbook
Tether says USAT will be issued through Anchorage Digital Bank, a nationally chartered trust bank regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). Unlike USDT, which is issued by an offshore entity, USAT will operate squarely within U.S. jurisdiction.
Tether’s CTO Paolo Ardoino framed the move as strategic rather than reactive:
“USAT isn’t meant to replace USDT. It’s about giving U.S.-regulated institutions a stablecoin option they can use without legal friction. There are no plans for yield or risk-taking — this is a pure payments instrument.”
GENIUS Act: what the law requires — and what Tether promises
The GENIUS Act, passed in July 2025, sets a new bar for U.S. dollar stablecoins. It requires issuers to:
- Maintain 100% backing in highly liquid assets (primarily short-term U.S. Treasuries and cash equivalents)
- Publish monthly reserve disclosures and undergo annual third-party audits
- Prohibit lending or rehypothecation of customer assets
- Hold a federal or state banking charter (or equivalent)
Tether has pledged to meet these standards, but key regulatory rule-making is still underway. That means USAT will launch under provisional guidance, and final enforcement parameters could shift.
As one former U.S. Treasury official noted privately, “GENIUS still leaves open how foreign-issued stablecoins will be treated. Reciprocity rules or access restrictions could emerge.”
How USAT stacks against USDC
Circle’s USDC is currently the leading regulated stablecoin, with roughly $33 billion in circulation. Circle publishes daily reserve reports and monthly attestations from Deloitte, and most of its reserves are short-term Treasuries and cash.
Tether has not specified reserve size for USAT, but sources familiar say it could start with $2–3 billion in initial issuance, ramping as regulated institutions onboard. Unlike USDC, which is issued from state trust entities, USAT will come from a nationally chartered bank, offering a deeper federal oversight layer.
Critically, Ardoino confirmed:
“USAT will not offer yield or staking. It’s fully passive. That makes it less appealing to traders, but far safer for compliance desks.”
Opportunities — and serious risks
Opportunities
- USAT could open the U.S. banking and asset management sector to Tether’s network, attracting capital that has avoided USDT due to regulatory risk.
- By launching under U.S. rules, USAT might be eligible for use in tokenized deposits, digital Treasuries, and regulated settlement networks.
Risks
- Liquidity gap: USDT has $115 billion in circulation and deep global liquidity. USAT will start from zero. If adoption stalls, liquidity risk could limit its utility.
- Regulatory whiplash: If final GENIUS Act rules tighten further, USAT could face sudden operational hurdles.
- Custody and counterparty risk: Institutions may hesitate until Anchorage proves operational resilience.
- Regulatory reciprocity: GENIUS could eventually restrict use of foreign stablecoins (like USDT) unless they meet similar standards—potentially reshaping access and flows.
The competitive equation
If USAT gains traction, it could pressure rivals to tighten disclosure and compliance further. Circle may need to accelerate its own federal charter path. Even Tether’s own USDT might face internal cannibalization as U.S.-regulated platforms migrate to USAT to lower compliance risk.
Still, market veterans caution against overestimating immediate shifts. One DeFi liquidity provider put it bluntly:
“USDT is everywhere. It’s the grease in crypto markets. Getting traders to switch—even for a ‘better’ coin—will be a grind.”
Bottom line
USAT signals that Tether is ready to compete inside the U.S. regulatory perimeter, not just outside it. It could redefine trust standards in stablecoins—but it must first overcome liquidity inertia, regulatory uncertainty, and entrenched network effects.
Whether it reshapes the market or fades as a niche product will depend on how fast major exchanges, custodians, and institutions embrace it once it goes live.
Comments