AI is flooding the web with images, songs, code, and text—but the money trails are murky. Who owns machine-generated works? Who gets paid for the data that trained the model—and the content it outputs? A new approach is emerging: represent ownership and licensing rights as tokens, use smart contracts to automate splits, and stream royalties to everyone with a stake—from dataset contributors to model owners to downstream creators.
The Legal Ground Is Shifting Under Creators’ Feet
In the U.S., copyright hinges on human authorship. The U.S. Copyright Office has clarified that only the “human-authored” portions of a work are protected; purely AI-generated content cannot be registered. In 2025, the D.C. Circuit upheld that principle when it ruled that an artwork created without human input by Stephen Thaler’s AI system could not be copyrighted.
In the EU, the AI Act has started imposing transparency obligations for general-purpose AI models, requiring disclosure of training data and risk management. The UK Intellectual Property Office is piloting a collective licensing framework to pay authors when their works are used in model training.
Meanwhile, companies are proving that licensing data for AI is commercially viable. Shutterstock has generated over $100 million in revenue from AI data licensing deals, showing that consent-based pipelines can scale.
Why this matters: If human authorship remains the legal cornerstone, creators and platforms will need new rails to trace provenance, assign fractional ownership, and pay everyone automatically as AI reshapes content production.
Tokenized Rights: From Music Drops to Data and Model IP
Music has already shown how royalties can flow on-chain. Platforms like Royal and anotherblock let fans buy tokens tied to music streaming revenue. These have paid real cash dividends to holders and proven that digital assets can carry enforceable royalty rights.
For data and models, similar systems are emerging:
- Data NFTs & datatokens. Ocean Protocol mints datasets as NFTs representing base IP, while issuing fungible datatokens that grant access rights. This lets dataset owners sell usage while retaining IP.
- Licensed-training certification. Fairly Trained certifies AI models that are trained only on licensed or consented data, offering a verifiable trust label that could underpin royalty networks.
Together, these ideas suggest a new model: tokenize datasets and models as on-chain assets, license their use via secondary tokens, and route all resulting revenue back to stakeholders automatically.
The Smart-Contract Plumbing Already Exists
- Royalty signaling: The ERC-2981 standard lets NFTs declare royalty information, ensuring secondary sales route revenue back to original creators.
- Programmatic revenue splits: 0xSplits offers audited smart contracts that instantly distribute any incoming crypto to predefined recipients, ideal for contributors, publishers, or model co-owners.
- Continuous payments: Superfluid enables real-time token streaming, useful for metered access to models or rolling contributor payouts.
How it could work in practice:
- A dataset or model is minted as a Data NFT (base IP).
- Access tokens license training or inference.
- Revenue from licenses flows into a Splits contract, auto-distributing to contributors.
- Downstream works (like AI music) embed ERC-2981 for secondary sales while streaming usage fees via Superfluid.
Friction Ahead: Securities Law and Substance Over Form
Regulators are watching closely. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has already treated some NFT projects—like Impact Theory and Stoner Cats—as unregistered securities offerings because they promised profits from the issuer’s efforts.
In Europe, the MiCA framework excludes unique NFTs but warns that fractionalized or large-series NFTs may be treated as fungible tokens subject to full regulation.
Translation: “AI content NFTs + revenue shares” can work, but token design must avoid investment-contract hallmarks and meet MiCA’s substance-over-form tests.
Signs of a Mainstream Path
- Licensing deals are working. Shutterstock’s nine-figure AI licensing revenue shows consent-based data pipelines can pay contributors at scale.
- Certification anchors trust. Fairly Trained’s badge helps marketplaces verify ethical training data, making it easier to justify revenue-sharing models.
- Music royalty rails are proven. Royal and anotherblock have demonstrated that on-chain royalties can work reliably and transparently.
“Human authorship is required,” the U.S. Copyright Office reminds—but prompts, edits, and curation are human inputs. The opportunity is to tokenize those contributions and licensed inputs, then automate payouts at internet scale.
What Creators and Platforms Should Do Now
- Tokenize rights carefully. Map base IP, licensed uses, and derivative outputs to distinct tokens, and store contributor data on-chain.
- Automate payouts. Use 0xSplits for fixed shares and Superfluid for streaming payments to ensure instant, transparent revenue flows.
- Stay compliant. Avoid “profit-promise” marketing, check MiCA rules for fractional NFTs, and document licensed training data (certification helps).
- Bridge Web2 and Web3. Use traditional licensing agreements where needed, and wrap them in tokenized access models for programmable royalties.
Outlook: Can “AI Content NFTs + Revenue Shares” Go Mainstream?
Yes—if three conditions are met:
- Clear provenance for training data and human edits
- Compliant token design that avoids securities pitfalls
- Frictionless payouts that make revenue shares meaningful at micro scale
With certified training inputs, tokenized rights, and automated splits, creators could finally trace value from dataset → model → output → sale/use—and get paid at each step.
Comments